The Supreme and Adidas are at odds.
The shoe company’s chief executive, Mark Parker, is accused of paying $100 million to a British businessman to make an ad campaign that he says was intended to help defeat the Brexit vote in the UK.
Then Adidas is also at odds with Nike, alleging it did the same.
Meanwhile, Nike has been hit by accusations that it made money off its sneakers.
And Adidas, which is a subsidiary of the German company, is under fire for paying for a New York Times article that said it had been paid $300 million by a Russian oligarch to make a documentary on the “looting of Russia.”
But if Nike and other shoe companies are getting paid for their sneakers, what do they get for their time?
The answer: They get to keep making money off them.
It’s not just the shoes themselves, of course.
A large swath of their sales are tied up in the supply chain.
In 2013, the Nike subsidiary that manufactures the Flyknit and NMD sneakers said that its products were more likely to sell than the sneakers made by its competitors, including Adidas and Under Armour.
That was true.
But Nike and its partners are getting the most from their sneakers.
The Adidas-branded shoes, by contrast, are a small percentage of the total value of the business.
If you buy an Adidas-brand shoe, you pay a premium.
This is because Adidas and Nike are so reliant on one another that the quality of their shoes is so important.
They’re designed to be made by the same company.
For instance, Nike’s XTR line of shoes has been around for years and is the brand’s most popular shoe line.
However, Nike says that the XTR 3.0 shoes are made by a subsidiary.
According to Adidas, this subsidiary is Nike and it makes Nike shoes.
Nike and Adidas say this is because the subsidiary’s product line includes all of the same materials and technologies.
When you buy Adidas shoes, you’re buying shoes made by an outsourced supplier, a third-party manufacturer, which may be less than a full third of a percent of the overall shoe industry.
On top of that, the shoes’ retail price is determined by a variety of factors, including the shoe’s weight, design, style and other details.
What this means for consumers is that the retail price of a Nike shoe is a much higher percentage of its overall value.
There’s a reason why shoe companies like Nike and Underarmour have been so successful at making their products as affordable as possible.
While they may not make as much money from their shoes, the retail prices they charge are much higher than their competitors’.
To be clear, it’s not the shoes that are paying for the premium in retail prices, it is the labor involved in manufacturing and shipping them to consumers.
So while Nike and Nike’s footwear brands are not the largest contributors to the retail market, they’re making a substantial contribution to it.
By far the biggest contributor to retail prices is the shoe companies themselves.
As the world’s largest shoe brand, Nike is the one that’s making the most money.
From the start, Nike saw the potential for a big boost in sales and profits as a result of Brexit.
Even after Brexit, Nike was still the top shoe company in the world.
Its brand saw a spike in sales after the vote to leave the European Union.
Since the vote, however, Nike and others have been scrambling to keep the brand on the top of the list, but not without significant costs.
Over the last three years, Nike spent more than $3 billion on advertising and marketing.
Those costs are being offset by a huge jump in demand for Nike shoes, as well as increased awareness and sales.
After Brexit, that attention and sales boosted Nike’s profit margins.
Now that they’re not the top two shoe brands in the market anymore, Nike could see its margins dip.
We’ll see if that happens.